HumiliationInc wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 10:26 pm
I honestly wonder if the traditional web forum is a dying artifact of the web, much like Geocities/Angelfire websites and chatrooms. Much of online discourse has migrated to other venues like Reddit and Substack and creative works often get a lot more audience response on DeviantArt. Granted, the subject matter of this forum wouldn't last on any of those platforms. But I'm thinking out loud as to whether there has been a macro cultural shift on the internet that no longer values forums with threads, avatars, signature lines, and a general sense of community.
This will be a long answer and I'll take your post as the inspiration for that. So this answer is only partially about you, so sorry about that.
I'm not saying you are wrong, but I think that what you are saying is irrelevant. And in some sense it's also dangerous. Since December last year when I first suggested some changes for RavishU I've heard all these big meta analyses: Forums are just outdated. Young people don't read anymore and need YouTube style recommendations on what to look at next. Socal media has destroyed people's attention spans. People just want to masturbate, because this is just porn. People are too ashamed, to wary to interact on a rape fantasy site.
While these meta trends in society might all be there, they all don't apply to us. If we were trying to compete against some mainstream social media plattform, sure, then these things would matter for us. But we are trying to carve out a small niche for a few dozen, maybe a couple of hundred active people. Im not here lamenting the fact that Twitter has more posts than us, that would be absurd. But we are a niche community that appeals to people who are into a taboo sexual topic and who enjoy or at least don't mind reading. We are not going with mainstream societal narratives by definition. We just need to carve out a small subgroup of people from the 1.5 billion people who speak English and get them to interact here. And the idea that this is somehow impossible because social media or whatever has just ruined people for that in general doesn't convince me.
Furthermore, here is what is dangerous about this: Once you start to explain a problem by some big meta trend it is very easy to come to the conclusion that you can't do anything anyway. If it is TikToks fault that nobody has the attention span anymore to read anything longer than flash fiction, then there is nothing you can do. It's a nice narrative to tell yourself if you want to convince yourself that, sadly, the issue is just out of your hand. If you look at what gets the most views on the forum, it's almost all long and medium length stories. And sure, there is some effect here that the author creates additional views for their story every time they post a new update and that is an inherent advantage for long stories. But the most viewed stories on the forum, Closing Time and Record Chaser, didn't have an update since June 17 and May 1 and are still generating plenty of views. So there is definitely a willingness to engage even with the most social media unfriendly content imaginable: long form story telling that does not offer instant sexual gratification, basically the antithesis to a 3 minute porn clip.
So let's bring it back to what we actually have control over, our own behavior. You signed up for a contest and submitted a story for both rounds of the tournament so far. But, unless I missed something, you didn't comment anything on any of the contestants stories nor did you reply to any of the feedback you got. I also learned that you apparently read and liked my story Men at War by a offhand reference in the topic about humor in rape fantasy. Even if you just posted what you said there:
HumiliationInc wrote: For an example on this site, I find Claire's story about the Peterson cult absolutely hysterical, because it's a satirical take on the manosphere and incel culture.
Then that would have contributed to the site and motivated me as an author and as the person running this place. And I'm not saying this to call you out, this is a general trend that extends beyond you. Let me tell you what I know just about my own stories. And I'm telling you this because I firmly believe that the stories of others aren't treated differently from mine. I just can't demonstrate it for them because I don't know their history.
Record Chaser sits now at a rating of 29 since July 10. It has made hundreds if not over 1000 views since then. Apparently no one feels compelled to push it over that 30 barrier to move it to the Popular Stories where it would serve the forum by motivating new users to register. But it's not just that, I know that the story is massively underrated.
@Shocker praised it to hgh heaven back on RavishU but hasn't commented or rated it here. I know that
@skuttrusk wanted to rate it with 3 points but accidentally rated chapter 7 instead of the whole story. I know that
@Verbal13 underrated it with only 1 point because at the time he didn't understand that he could give ratings with more than 1 point.
It's similar for my stories Venus' Touch, The Infinite Rape and You, with You also being just one 3 point rating away from becoming a Popular Story.
But the most egregious example is Men at War. I know that
@Shocker read and loved it on RavishU. I know that
@HistBuff read and voted on it twice back on RavishU with two different accounts. I know by your offhand comment that you read and enjoyed it. And I know that the user
@Nightlight10 specifically registered to comment and tell me how much he liked it. That's 4 people who haven't rated it and 3 who didn't comment on it. These four ratings alone would bring it close to 30 points as well.
And I could give you more examples of people voting in a poll of one of my stories that they came reading this but didn't comment or rate it. And my point is: I find it hard to believe that the exact same thing is not also happening with other authors' stories. Just because I can not track this for Shocker's or Blue's or your stories because I'm not that aware of their previous reception before they were posted here doesn't mean that the same thing is no happening there too. I mean, what reason could there possibly be that this happens only to my stories, right? I also know that Shocker's Fugitives story had only 14 ratings despite 16 people voting for it when it won the contest. And I know that of those 14 not everyone voted for it. So the story is missing at least 3 ratings from people who are here, who did read it and who voted for it in the contest poll. This hurts the forum. I can only imagine how many stories we would have in the Popular Stories board if this kind of thing didn't happen. We might even be close to having our first Community Favorite.
To bring it back to you personally one last time. If you had commented something about the Peterson cult in Men at War, then that would have made me happy. I would have responded to you and maybe we would have gotten into a bit of a back and forth discussion. You and I, we both enjoy a good discussion with thoughtful arguments. And I guarantee you, the next thing that would have happened would have been
@Lucius joining us in our discussion. I could also see
@JTCK throw in a comment or two. That is how communities are built. Engagement with the core content of the community and then a discussion based on shared experience. And some who read the story in the future might see that and think: "Oh ok, this is not just people mindlessly fapping here but actually talking with each other... cool." That is the image you would want to project to new users stumbling over the site. You want them to perceive people actually talking about the stories they read as normal.